There had, I think at times, been some ambiguity about how involved the Sackler family were in the business and how much culpability there was there. There’s obviously been decades now of coverage of Purdue Pharma and Ox圜ontin and Purdue as a business. What did you learn in reporting this book that would surprise them?

Lawmakers introduce a bill to prevent Sacklers from using bankruptcy ‘loophole’ to evade liabilityĪt this point, a lot of people might have a general sense of Purdue Pharma and who the Sacklers are. He notes that the New Yorker’s fact-checking process turned up no errors in the magazine piece.

Keefe writes in his book that the Sacklers did not agree to interviews, and that “the Raymond wing opted for a more actively antagonistic role,” with legal threats and accusations of journalistic malpractice. Documents being released in Purdue’s bankruptcy now demonstrate that Sackler family members who served on Purdue’s board of directors acted ethically and lawfully.” In a statement, Daniel Connolly, an attorney for the family of Raymond Sackler, said: “This author has refused to correct errors in his past reporting and also blatantly violated journalistic ethics by refusing to meet with representatives for the Sackler family during the reporting of his book. The descendants of the Sackler brothers who built Purdue Pharma have different representatives, and a spokesman for the family of Mortimer Sackler said, “Our focus is on concluding a resolution that will provide help to people and communities in need, rather than on this book.” Sacklers boost Purdue Pharma settlement to $4.3 billion in plan that would end their control of the opioid maker

Sacklers book